Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Victims Unite!
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6304

Comment on SAVE LEGAL AID – who pays for what justice – in the interests of the client or the employer? by Stuart Wilkie

$
0
0

Margaret Wilkie is being denied legal aid to defend her from perjury, fraud and an attempt to defraud her of her home and fraudulently requested costs from an Order for Sale on her property by Herr Hermann Bernard Reemtsma of Eaubrink Farm GmbH. His agents have all committed perjury to pervert the course of justice. His land agent, a chartered surveyor, admitted he was not allowed to do a drive-by valuation, then provided just that for Norwich Court. It devalued the property between £100 – 240,000 pounds. The Court increased it by £65,000, but awarded costs to the Respondent – Herr Reemtsma. He now wants to lodge these costs, obtained under a fraud and perjury, against the property with an Order for Sale – again – on Wednesday 12th March in the Peterborough Court. There is apparently no legal aid for a Lawyer to defend it and Mrs Wilkie is 83 and has Lymphodaema (it starts in the hot weather).

Reemstma is just a fraudster and land thief and the Courts accept this from a Barrister and provide no assistance (not even a videolink) for an aged Lady.

Whilst the Statements entered into court are perjury, provable by documents, the Courts refuse to look at these white collar crimes, as if they do not exist.

Fraud was alleged from day one – a forged map, hand drawn and twice the size of the area that was being falsely claimed was shown – purporting for it to be an official Land Registry map. This was simply ignored by the lower Court.

Reemstma failed to give either his full name or his place of work – another false way of avoiding prosecution. The list is endless – No Court will the real crimes.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6304

Trending Articles