Quote;- “(d) The sum so payable is not a traffic contravention debt.”
Basically; (if I understand you right) they appear to be saying that if someone is `fined` for not paying a tax-disc, and get a `traffic contravention debt` (via magistrates); and if you appeal it, then it suddenly becomes transformed into a secret magical world of fantasy debt-fine.
Maybe its to avoid Crown Court cases; where the law is looked at more closely on many occasions (and is more prone to appeals)?
They don`t want the public to know the law; as that would give the public some material to work with.
